Pages

Showing posts with label Oil Painting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil Painting. Show all posts

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Artifact of Empire - 1830s

Artifact: Oil Painting. Creator: Alexander Rippingille. Made in Bristol, Britain. 1834. Found on ArtStor.org
From: Image of the Black in Western Art: Harvard University

What is it?
My artifact is an oil painting that was made to commemorate and comment on the emancipation of slaves in the colonies of the British Empire. The Act for the Abolition of Slavery was given Royal Assent on August 1st 1833. The painting, made circa 1834, shows a black slave family burying their shackles and holding up their arms in a gesture of gratitude. It is a one of a kind, unique painting made from oils on a canvas. The painting, entitled: To the Friends of Negro Emancipation, is an homage, and congratulatory work, for those who were part of the fight to push through the Act of Emancipation in 1833, and all the years in its prelude. The title might refer to those white Europeans who fought for the slaves, but the image itself is a congratulations to the blacks who were able, from then on, to cast off their shackles and never submit to white oppression again. Rippingille must have felt some sympathy for the slaves, otherwise, would he have painted such an image?

Context
Apart from India, whose laws fell under the ruling of the East India Company, the British colonies were to release all slaves and indentured servants from holding. This image of celebration captures a historic and politically charged event. The white slaver and slave owner lost a considerable amount of stock, in terms of produce, work force, investment and of course, money. The white man, in the colonies, would probably not have been happy at the emancipation of his slaves. Abolitionism was more of a domestic triumph of human rights and morals.
The industrial revolution, that began in Britain around 1750, provided an exponential increase in wealth, productivity, power and influence for the country. The British Empire had already existed for over a hundred years, the East India Company having established roots in India in the mid-1600s, but colonization of most of the Empire happened in the 1700s and 1800s. To further their goals of domination and wealth, the British established a slave trade to rival that of the Arabs (who dominated the east coast of Africa). Such slaves were captured on the West African coast, stowed on slave ships and delivered to colonies in the West Indies and the 13 American Colonies in exchange for financial and exotic produce including Tabaco and sugar cane.
In 1807, the Slave Trade was abolished. Slaves were no longer being taken from Africa by British ships. By 1823, the first Anti-Slavery Association was formed for the sole purpose of releasing all colony and motherland slaves from bondage.
In 1833, the emancipation bill was passed. In 1834, all slaves were totally freed from ownership, white or otherwise.

How does it relate to what we’ve read in class?
The book was published in 1847, a full 14 years after emancipation, but no direct mention of slavery occurs in Jane Eyre.. However, the character of Bertha Mason does give some insight into how people of color were portrayed in that time. Bertha is described as being a big woman, having a purple face, bloated features, thick and shaggy hair, swelled lips and wild stares. Almost as if to describe an animal (pg. 381). A creole is a derogatory term for a white-black hybrid, typically from a male plantation or slave owner and a female slave. Known as the outcast race, a creole is white enough to be accepted into British society but black enough to be treated with contempt as soon as they return home. “If they are sent to England to be educated, they are treated as gentlemen, and admitted into the best society; but when they return to the West Indies, they also return to their former position of compulsory debasement.” (Line 28-31 A View of West Indian society article) Bertha, whose mother was a creole, is at most ¾ white and a second generation creole. Yet, if she is described in such a way by a character like Jane Eyre, who is shown to be kind, learned and accepting, the colored person must have still been seen as animalistic and less than human (something which is clearly seen in the Herge comics of Tintin, even in the 1930s (100 years after emancipation)).
The black person, or former slave, remains in a down cast light even after s/he is freed.



"To The Friends of Negro Emancipation" - Alexander Rippingille on the Abolitionism Act of 1833

 

               
               Artifact of Empire 1830s from Tom Rosenzweig

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

The Knights Errant Part 2


As mentioned in the previous post, the Knight's Errant that we see today was not what Sir John Everett Millais originally painted. In his original painting the woman was facing the knight, because of this, many believed this expressed the woman's 'loose morals'. In response to this, Millais cut out the torso of the woman and repainted it to have her looking away from the knight, showing modesty.


The original cut out torso of the woman was reused for another of Millais' paintings 'The Martyr of The Solway'

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

The Knight's Errant

Overall
                This oil painting depicts a typical chivalrous knight helping a damsel in distress. In this almost life sized painting, an armor clad knight is freeing a stripped, defenseless women who was attacked and kidnapped. The knight’s sword is covered in blood and the assumed attacker’s corpse can be seen behind him. The tree the woman is tied to is a Silver birch, which at the time, was identified with the female gender; being referred to as “Lady Birch”.  
About the Artist
                The artist: Sir John Everett, Millais was born June 8th 1829. He was a child prodigy; he attended Sass's Art School in London and won a silver medal at the Society of Arts at the age of nine.
Reception
Because of the female nudity of the painting, it was given very critical reviews.  A lot of this critic was on Millais’ treatment of the woman.  Critics thought that this was an attempt to idealize nudity and place it in a classical (Greek or Roman) setting. Millais was actually trying emulate an early Victorian style of painting started by artist William Etty. Etty’s was known for his nude paintings but what Millais really admired was the techniques and rich colors Etty used. Stangely enough one of the main critics of the paintings was that the woman was too “life-like”.  “the manner is almost too real for the treatment of the nude” (quoted in Nead p.235 of the June 1870 Art Journal).  Not only that but some questioned the woman’s morals. Because of this as well as the fact that the painting wasn’t selling, Millais cut the head and torso off the painting. He then repainted the woman to be looking way to make her appear more modest. The portion of the painting cut out was reused in another painting a year later. After the revision, the painting was sold in 1874.
How it Connects to empire
The first thing is the controversy that was caused by the nudity of the woman. Due to the more conserved nature of the English more importantly English women, nudity was mostly connected with savages. Although it is made clear in the painting that the woman was nude because she was attacked, critics still questioned and assumed the woman’s morals.
Next is the literal name of the painting.  The Knight’s Errant is the adventure a knight goes on in search of people to help. This can be somewhat connected to how the English “help” other countries such as India. Because the English identify themselves as basically the ‘pinnacle of society’ it is their duty to help others. One of these means of “help” would be the missionaries that went around spreading (forcing) Christianity onto others. Similar to Ms. Clack in the Moonstone
 Work Cited

  • Virag, Rebecca. "Sir John Everett Millais, Bt, 'The Knight Errant' 1870." Tate. N.p., Mar. 2001. Web. 20 Oct. 2014.
  • Riggs, Terry. "Sir John Everett Millais, Bt, 'Ophelia' 1851-2." Tate. N.p., Jan. 1998. Web. 20 Oct. 2014.