Pages

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Artifact of Empire - 1830s

Artifact: Oil Painting. Creator: Alexander Rippingille. Made in Bristol, Britain. 1834. Found on ArtStor.org
From: Image of the Black in Western Art: Harvard University

What is it?
My artifact is an oil painting that was made to commemorate and comment on the emancipation of slaves in the colonies of the British Empire. The Act for the Abolition of Slavery was given Royal Assent on August 1st 1833. The painting, made circa 1834, shows a black slave family burying their shackles and holding up their arms in a gesture of gratitude. It is a one of a kind, unique painting made from oils on a canvas. The painting, entitled: To the Friends of Negro Emancipation, is an homage, and congratulatory work, for those who were part of the fight to push through the Act of Emancipation in 1833, and all the years in its prelude. The title might refer to those white Europeans who fought for the slaves, but the image itself is a congratulations to the blacks who were able, from then on, to cast off their shackles and never submit to white oppression again. Rippingille must have felt some sympathy for the slaves, otherwise, would he have painted such an image?

Context
Apart from India, whose laws fell under the ruling of the East India Company, the British colonies were to release all slaves and indentured servants from holding. This image of celebration captures a historic and politically charged event. The white slaver and slave owner lost a considerable amount of stock, in terms of produce, work force, investment and of course, money. The white man, in the colonies, would probably not have been happy at the emancipation of his slaves. Abolitionism was more of a domestic triumph of human rights and morals.
The industrial revolution, that began in Britain around 1750, provided an exponential increase in wealth, productivity, power and influence for the country. The British Empire had already existed for over a hundred years, the East India Company having established roots in India in the mid-1600s, but colonization of most of the Empire happened in the 1700s and 1800s. To further their goals of domination and wealth, the British established a slave trade to rival that of the Arabs (who dominated the east coast of Africa). Such slaves were captured on the West African coast, stowed on slave ships and delivered to colonies in the West Indies and the 13 American Colonies in exchange for financial and exotic produce including Tabaco and sugar cane.
In 1807, the Slave Trade was abolished. Slaves were no longer being taken from Africa by British ships. By 1823, the first Anti-Slavery Association was formed for the sole purpose of releasing all colony and motherland slaves from bondage.
In 1833, the emancipation bill was passed. In 1834, all slaves were totally freed from ownership, white or otherwise.

How does it relate to what we’ve read in class?
The book was published in 1847, a full 14 years after emancipation, but no direct mention of slavery occurs in Jane Eyre.. However, the character of Bertha Mason does give some insight into how people of color were portrayed in that time. Bertha is described as being a big woman, having a purple face, bloated features, thick and shaggy hair, swelled lips and wild stares. Almost as if to describe an animal (pg. 381). A creole is a derogatory term for a white-black hybrid, typically from a male plantation or slave owner and a female slave. Known as the outcast race, a creole is white enough to be accepted into British society but black enough to be treated with contempt as soon as they return home. “If they are sent to England to be educated, they are treated as gentlemen, and admitted into the best society; but when they return to the West Indies, they also return to their former position of compulsory debasement.” (Line 28-31 A View of West Indian society article) Bertha, whose mother was a creole, is at most ¾ white and a second generation creole. Yet, if she is described in such a way by a character like Jane Eyre, who is shown to be kind, learned and accepting, the colored person must have still been seen as animalistic and less than human (something which is clearly seen in the Herge comics of Tintin, even in the 1930s (100 years after emancipation)).
The black person, or former slave, remains in a down cast light even after s/he is freed.



"To The Friends of Negro Emancipation" - Alexander Rippingille on the Abolitionism Act of 1833

 

               
               Artifact of Empire 1830s from Tom Rosenzweig

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Artifact:
Newspaper article. Creator unknown. Written in London, England, 1860. Found in The Times (London) Digital Archive (1785-1985).


Source:
"The Late Mysterious Child Murder At Road." Times [London, England] 28 July 1860: 12. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 14 Oct. 2014.

Context:
            My artifact is an excerpt from one of the many newspaper accounts of the Constance Kent/Road-house Murder Case of 1860. The excerpt that I am focusing on headlined as: “The Late Mysterious Child Murder at Road”, in the London Times on July 28, 1860.  There were many excerpts that the London Times newspaper covered from the year 1860 to the year 1865 regarding the Constance Kent/Road-house Murder Case.1 This excerpt in particular, which I am using as my artifact of empire, is merely announcing where the investigation currently stood during the investigation of the murder of a young Francis Saville Kent. In other words, my artifact is one excerpt out of the many excerpts from the newspaper coverage of the crime, the investigation, the confession, the trial, and the trial’s aftermath.2
Description of My Artifact:
My artifact of empire was the tenth newspaper account regarding the Constance Kent Murder case, that was printed on July 28, 1860, and titled: The Late Mysterious Child Murder At Road. This is the article that is devoted to the publics review of the case. In this excerpt from The London Times, the reporter talks about a scene where Constance Kent’s solicitor asks for the charges against her to be dropped because of Inspector Whicher’s (the inspector on the case at that particular time) lack of professionalism. In this way, and due to this article, Constance Kent’s solicitor played a very big part in Inspector Whicher’s career ending; the public turned against Whicher and even the press taunted him for bullying Miss Kent. Three years after this article was published, Whicher retired.  At the end of this article, the reporter states that the prisoner was discharged due to her father paying for her bail.3
How Does it Relate to What We’ve Read in Class?:
            My artifact of empire relates to the novel The Moonstone, written by Wilkie Collins, because the Constance Kent/Road-house Murder Case of 1860 fascinated Collins, and much of the case is woven into the material of The Moonstone.1
            The first of the Constance Kent case is seen in chapter 12, when Gabriel Betteredge introduces Sergeant Cuff, who happens to have a fondness for roses. It seems that Collins was inspired by Sergeant Frederick Adolphus Williamson, a man who helped detective Whicher’s investigation of the Road-house murder case, and who had a serious passion for gardening (page 156).2
            Later on in this chapter, we see again, some details that link the novel to the Constance Kent murder case. This is seen through the use of the night-dress as “key” evidence in the case of the Diamond. This relates back to the Road-house murder case, except instead of blood stains Collins uses smeared paint on the night-dress (page 164).2
            Another connection between the murder case and the novel is the resemblance of Superintendent Seegrave to Mr. Foley. In the Kent murder case, Mr. Foley withheld evidence and his criminal negligence was publicly acknowledged in The Times.2 This occurred before Whicher had taken over the case. In this way, you can see how Superintendent Seegrave is based off of Mr. Foley, because Superintendent Seegrave’s work stopped and than Sergeant Cuff picked up where he had left off, although Sergeant Cuff comically points out that Seegrave want about his investigation the wrong way. Similar? I think so.
References:
1 Robert Ashley, Wilkie Collins and a Vermont Murder Trial: 1948, The New England Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 368-373. doi: 10.2307/361097.
2 Wilkie Collins, edited by Steve Farmer, The Moonstone: 1999 (Canada: Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency), pages: 156, 164; Appendix B: 560-576.
3 "The Late Mysterious Child Murder At Road." Times [London, England] 28 July 1860: 12. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 14 Oct. 2014.
To Find More Information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constance_Kent
http://www.historybytheyard.co.uk/road_hill_house.htm
http://murderpedia.org/female.K/k/kent-constance.htm